On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 22:37 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > Actually, the package _isn't_ there. They should both be in the x86_64 > tree (the i386 package simply duplicated into it). However, only the > nemiver-devel.i386 is present, the base nemiver.i386 package is not > there. > > I can confirm that this also seems to happen with the > download.fedora.redhat.com (the mirrors' master, IIRC) > > This seems at first glance to me like a bug in whatever created the > repo, since the devel subpackage contains an explicit dependency on the > main package of the same NVR. Hmm. :| Actually it looks like a packaging bug. nemiver-devel-0.5.1-1.fc9.i386 has a require of nemiver-0.5.1-1.fc9, which nemiver-0.5.1-1.fc9.x86_64 satisfies. Usually a -devel package will have a .so symlink to an actual library file that is in an arch specific package, which is how the arch specific multilib package gets pulled into the repo. What is it about the nemiver-devel.i386 that absolutely requires nemiver.i386 instead of nemiver.x86_64? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
