On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Mike <mike.cloaked@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So the main area where I see there is a lot of work yet to complete is > with KDE4. Does anyone have their own lists of where work/testing is > needed. Install testing is always wonderful. Anaconda doesn't get a lot of testing from general users, since they just use it once and forget about it (it is the installer, after all :) ). But there's a myriad of different things that it can do and is dependent upon, so it needs some serious QA love (which it generally gets). I try to do an install a day to keep the doctor away :) (sometimes even more than that). Snake makes this really easy and able to be reproduced. One thing that we didn't really get time for in Beta that we would have loved to is verification of the installed pieces. For instance, in a default desktop install, does everything work and sustain a basic click-through test without crashing? Are the components of the panel working as they should be? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
