On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 16:40 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > OpenJDK is not Free Software yet. "GPLv2 with exceptions" is not the > license for OpenJDK, it's the license for the Free Software portion of > OpenJDK. There's non-Free Software in there as well. > > How did this get past the Packaging Guidelines and the Licensing > policies, if it's clearly against the stated goal of the Fedora > project and its own policies? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438421 > > > Couldn't we at least provide a choice for those who naïvely believed > Fedora was about freedom, retaining IcedTea as an option, rather than > obsoleting it? As the bug states, you're going to need to provide some examples to your claims. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list