Kevin Kofler wrote:
Johann B. Gudmundsson <johannbg <at> hi.is> writes:
Jon Stanley wrote:
Your book is not everyone's, nor probably even the majority of
people's. I for one use sshd on *every* machine that I own (yes, I
even login to my desktop remotely - that's how I IRC).
As I said I needed to know who were the target audience were
and I see it's not desktop users thats why Ubuntu succeeded were Fedora
should
have long ago ( yes I have had high hopes for a long time )...
I don't see why sshd would automatically imply "not for desktop users". You
just replied to someone who uses it on his desktop (to access his desktop from
remote machines, which is not even far-fetched unless you work from home and
never travel). As soon as you have at least 2 computers (e.g. one desktop and
one laptop, which is fairly common), you'll come to appreciate SSH (and SFTP
which comes with it - how else is a desktop user who also owns a laptop going
to transfer his/her data between the 2 machines? Through the Internet? How's
that good for security?).
Yes, its quite useful for desktop users. I regularly sync portions of my home
from several virtual machines, my laptop, and my desktop, all setup with keypair
identity logins. However I would expect anyone wanting to do something similar
to have no problem opening the firewall and turning on the service. Most
desktop users don't need ssh open to the outside (maybe on their local network
sure). Its very handy to ssh in and reboot a machine on this X has crashed for
instance.
Perhaps the basic firewall configuration should have local address pinholes but
not be open routable addresses. Its something to consider.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
