On Mar 9, 2008, at 11:51 AM, John Summerfield wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 19:24:09 -0800 (PST), Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote:
While I agree that bugzilla suffers from the size of the data and
from the
number of tickets, I think you have false expectations. Those
tickets in
bugzilla, that are not closed for years, are there because there is
no
end of tickets, which are handled with a higher priority.
Speaking of which, I'm a little puzzled at "priority." I'd have
thought that a breakage that has the potential to make a release
(I'm thinking of a kernel bug I reported recently and have mentioned
here, and which _might_ be a mkinitrd bug) would have a high priority.
We specifically ignore priority on bugs right now. Bug submitters can
set the field however they like, and everyone thinks *their* bug is
the most important. Until that field is locked so only the assignee
and triagers can modify it, it's not useful.
If a bug is *actually* high-priority it'll get added to one of the bug
trackers by the triage team.
-w
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
