Re: F9alpha and KDE4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lubomir Kundrak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 03:35 -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
Nevertheless, I have tested KDE4 and agree with you. It is just not
ready. It lacks many features for which I had started using KDE in the
first place.

It's not actually meant to be completely ready. On the other hand, we do
still include KDE3, don't we? If I'm wrong then it's ....not nice
situation for KDE users (I use Gnome anyways :).

I use gnome as well, but no its not parallel installable. The kde3 support that exists is only libs for applications compiled against them. Getting kde3 wrestled in side by side would be a major undertaking apparently.

KDE4 wont't be bad once it's finished. I tried it from the live media
and was impressed with the artwork and speed. Well, there's not much to
the dekstop environment, is it? :)

I was also impressed with the speed... seems like gnome is seriously lagging at the moment in rawhide. Nautilus is painfully slow, but all the menus are as well (I've got menu icons all turned off because they are so horribly slow to draw).

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux