On 12/02/2008, Fastie <fastie81@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > Yes I do agree. The radeon driver is worst. I had the same problem, after > installing the radeonhd driver everything worked fine. > May be a better move than sticking to the radeon driver. > Chris > > > > On Feb 12, 2008 2:02 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I noticed (and it was pointed out here previously) that the radeonhd > > driver was not included in the alpha iso. I have an R530 based video > > card that ended up being handled by the radeon driver which then failed, > > so that X wouldn't start. I had to manually set the driver to vesa to > > get it to work. Due to some other problems I haven't had a chance to test > > the radeonhd driver (and won't get another chance until tomorrow), but it > > seems it could have hardly have been worse using it than what actually > > happened. > > In my opinion it seems like it would be better to include it than not > > (unless it causes problems for cards that are supported by the radeon > > driver). Nope, Radeonhd is a separate effort by Suse and will most likely soon be surpassed by ongoing RHT efforts. For more information see: http://linux.conf.au/programme/detail?TalkID=81 audio and video available. Cheers -- Christopher Brown http://www.chruz.com -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
