Patrick wrote:
Hi,
Don't know if this is an accepted way of mentioning it instead of filing
a bug. Hitting bz for small things like this seems overkill. Actually
I'm not even sure if this needs mentioning :) So pointers welcome.
Laptop with F9 updated to todays' Rawhide.
$ sudo yum install drivel
...
Error: Missing Dependency: libsoup-2.2.so.8()(64bit) is needed by
package drivel-2.1.1-0.3.20071130svn.fc9.x86_64 (development)
...
$ rpm -qi libsoup | grep Version
Version : 2.3.0
Also, the drivel version is a bit confusing. I got the srpm from koji
and it seems to contain 2.0.3.
See the rawhide report for today 20070207, dependencies list:
drivel-2.1.1-0.3.20071130svn.fc9.x86_64 requires libsoup-2.2.so.8()(64bit)
So a general rule, check the rawhide report daily (it should mail out after the
repos are rebuilt) for things like this. It really does not need to get to
bugzilla, since the maintainers are getting emails once a day about these. If
you see dep issues that are not listed in the report, then bring them to the
list or bz.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
