--- Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:13:06 -0800 > Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Andrew Farris wrote: > > > that it in fact is not a dependency problem, but > rather a conflict, > > > which may not ever be reported in the broken > dependencies list... > > > > that was meant to say: since it actually is a > conflict, not > > dependency.. > > That is, in fact the correct answer. Conflicts > aren't checked, as they > have some odd meanings, particularly in multilib > environments. > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours? > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list Thanks for the explanation(s). These are problems encountered in testing. Regards, Antonio ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
