On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:28:58PM -0500, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > > > It seems reasonable that anything in F9 should be more up to date than > anything in F8 (see another post in this thread). > > tetex-xdvi-3.0-44.3.fc8 > xdvik-22.84.13-10.fc9 It is; but the main difference is that F8 packages provide 'tetex' distribution while rawhide comes with 'texlive' (the later evolved from and in continues a work carried for many years by Thomas Esser with tetex). Right now you are seeing in rawhide a "transition period" and from time to time something may tie itself in a knot although in general thing looks really smooth with this. One of issues is to provide a natural updgrade path - of course. OTOH mixing here packages from F8 and rawhide does not sound like a good idea. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
