Jim Cornette wrote:
drago01 wrote:
On Jan 25, 2008 5:01 PM, Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:52 -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
In fedora kernels always got rebased to 2.6.x+1 after a bit of testing
I don't see any reason why this should change now. This way we get
upstream improvements (new/better hardware support) and bugfixes
without having to wait/update to the the next release.
I like the older releases keeping the older versions. I have to run the
older version because of a network lockup which rawhide kernels exhibit.
kernel-2.6.23.14-107.fc8 works fine at .23
kernel-2.6.24-0.167.rc8.git4.fc9 introduces bugs in .24
I'd rather have newer programs and a stabilized kernel. The drivers that
I need are available and work excellent before .24 introduced bugs.
Openoffice.org for rawhide loads quicker and works without problems.
Advancements in programs is more important to me than adding and
deleting support for kernel level devices.
fc9 kernels hang at
1161 ? D< 0:00 /sbin/modprobe
pcmcia:m015Fc000Af06fn00pfn00paA17C320Epb3D011600pc00000000pd00000000
Whatever that is.
Jim
You know, there is nothing holding you back from not updating kernels, even if
.24 versions are backported and pushed out for f7/f8. The kernels that have
been built before it are available, and should continue to be until EOL (well,
forever actually if you just keep a copy for yourself).
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
