On 01/25/2008 07:11 PM, Jim Cornette wrote: > drago01 wrote: >> On Jan 25, 2008 5:01 PM, Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 09:52 -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> In fedora kernels always got rebased to 2.6.x+1 after a bit of testing >> I don't see any reason why this should change now. This way we get >> upstream improvements (new/better hardware support) and bugfixes >> without having to wait/update to the the next release. >> > > I like the older releases keeping the older versions. I have to run the > older version because of a network lockup which rawhide kernels exhibit. > kernel-2.6.23.14-107.fc8 works fine at .23 > kernel-2.6.24-0.167.rc8.git4.fc9 introduces bugs in .24 > > I'd rather have newer programs and a stabilized kernel. The drivers that > I need are available and work excellent before .24 introduced bugs. > Openoffice.org for rawhide loads quicker and works without problems. > Advancements in programs is more important to me than adding and > deleting support for kernel level devices. > > fc9 kernels hang at > 1161 ? D< 0:00 /sbin/modprobe > pcmcia:m015Fc000Af06fn00pfn00paA17C320Epb3D011600pc00000000pd00000000 > > Whatever that is. > It's loading the driver for a Cisco Aironet wireless PCMCIA adapter. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
