Andrew Farris wrote: > Neal Becker wrote: >> nash received SIGSEGV! Backtrace (12): >> /sbin/nash[0x40c7c9] >> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3834c30f30] >> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028a89] >> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028e21] >> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x24)[0x3e1dc02411] >> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x29)[0x3e1dc01bef] >> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x3e1e415fe2] >> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3a)[0x3e1e416661] >> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x16)[0x3e1e406ef4] >> /sbin/nash[0x40ccd0] >> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x3834c1e074] >> /sbin/nash[0x404179] >> >> > > Which kernel was this? (what today are we talking about?) This occurred > during the install or booting? > > kernel-2.6.23.14-115? what arch? That kernel pushed to updates-testing > 1/24. > kernel-2.6.23.14-107.fc8.x86_64 I see a bunch of similar reports showing up on linux.redhat.fedora.general. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
