On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:41 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > nash received SIGSEGV! Backtrace (12): > /sbin/nash[0x40c7c9] > /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3834c30f30] > /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028a89] > /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028e21] > /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x24)[0x3e1dc02411] > /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x29)[0x3e1dc01bef] > /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x3e1e415fe2] > /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3a)[0x3e1e416661] > /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x16)[0x3e1e406ef4] > /sbin/nash[0x40ccd0] > /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x3834c1e074] > /sbin/nash[0x404179] Well - whatever it is, it's not consistent. I just upgraded both my systems; One running a 32-bit kernel and the other a 64-bit kernel, and both with all the extra nVidia stuff and various updates from today. No issues on either system so far... Cheers, Chris -- ==================================================== In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. --Yogi Berra -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
