Re: Today's F8 kernel update fails!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 06:41 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> nash received SIGSEGV!  Backtrace (12):
> /sbin/nash[0x40c7c9]
> /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3834c30f30]
> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028a89]
> /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028e21]
> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x24)[0x3e1dc02411]
> /usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x29)[0x3e1dc01bef]
> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x3e1e415fe2]
> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3a)[0x3e1e416661]
> /usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x16)[0x3e1e406ef4]
> /sbin/nash[0x40ccd0]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x3834c1e074]
> /sbin/nash[0x404179]

Well - whatever it is, it's not consistent. I just upgraded both my
systems; One running a 32-bit kernel and the other a 64-bit kernel, and
both with all the extra nVidia stuff and various updates from today. No
issues on either system so far...

Cheers,

Chris


--
====================================================
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice there is.

--Yogi Berra

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux