2008/1/8, Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx>: > Antonio M wrote: > > 2008/1/7, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Antonio M wrote: > >>> I have found from the crash report that it looks for service > >>> yum-updatesd (and if not running it crashes). > >>> Is it true?? > >> That isn't likely. Where is the crash report? > >> > >> Rahul > >> > >> -- > >> fedora-test-list mailing list > >> fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe: > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > >> > > > > I apologize, but it seems that I forgot to save it- too late, here..I > > suppose time to go to bed :-) > > Unless you had deliberately stopped updatesd I would suspect something had > caused it to fail starting which also was effecting rhythmbox (i.e. ___ caused > both updatesd and rhythmbox problems). > > -- > Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> <ajfarris@xxxxxxxxx> > gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3 > No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer > ---- ---- > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > Andrew my question is why Rhythmbox should need to have updatesd running. I use to disable updatesd, so the user is not annoyed by popup windows, only the administrator should see any availability of updates...my two cents -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
