On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:00:08 +0900, John Summerfield wrote: > > I wanted Neal to dig a little deeper and find the problem himself. My > > small set of questions lead to enough details to locate the problem. > > That's fine, and I try to do that too, but you did make an assumption > (that he wasn't root) without any evidence to support it. Running chkconfig _with_ sudo and service _without_ sudo at least was inconsistent enough and made me point out that chkconfig --list should not need sudo either: >>>> /sbin/service named status >>>> named: unrecognized service >>>> >>>> sudo /sbin/chkconfig named --list >>>> named 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off And, of course, it would be much more of an assumption to guess that "service ... status" does not need superuser privileges to read pid/lock files (and to do stuff beyond that). -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
