Re: Fwd: closing out old bugs of unmaintained releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for all of your work on this so far!

Jon Stanley said the following on 01/04/2008 12:11 PM Pacific Time:
As part of a re-launch of the bug triage project [1,2], I believe that
it would be beneficial to mass close the bugs that are for releases
that are no longer maintained.  Please find my proposal for this
below.  Sorry for cross-posting, but it's relevant across multiple
communities within Fedora.

I will be at FUDCon in order to discuss the very topic of the
re-launch of the triage project.

[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00009.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-January/msg00000.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Jan 4, 2008 1:45 PM
Subject: closing out old bugs of unmaintained releases
To: fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx


I can put some time this weekend into closing out old bugs, however,
before doing so, I wanted to make sure that our messaging is crystal
clear.  What I had been doing for kernel bugs is placing them in
NEEDINFO_REPORTER and asking if the problem still existed, etc after
manually reviewing the bugs (some I changed to a current release
because it was mentioned in comments, but not in the version
metadata).  However, this won't scale - there's no way that I or
anybody else can reasonably review 3600 bugs for ones that are
incorrectly tagged.  This leaves us with ~9000 bugs (F7, F8, and
rawhide) to deal with (still a monumental task).  I propose doing
something similar with rawhide bugs that haven't been touched in ~6
months, not sure of the number of those, haven't looked yet.  Here's
the proposed comment to WONTFIX these.  I want to get the most input
possible before doing this:

<begin>
Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug.  Unfortunately, this
version of Fedora has reach end-of-life and is no longer maintained.
Please refer to  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle for an
explanation of the Fedora lifecycle policy.

In addition, how about a link to this email-thread explaining why this action is considered necessary (e.g. we need to clear the deck, etc.)?

We therefore regret the necessity of closing this bug report WONTFIX.
Please upgrade to a currently maintained release of Fedora, currently
either Fedora 7 or Fedora 8, and attempt to reproduce this bug.  If
the bug still exists, feel free to re-open this bug report, changing
the version accordingly, or file a new bug report (you can use the
'Clone as Bug' link at the top of this bug report in order to preserve
the content of this bug in the new one).

s/'Fedora 7 or Fedora 8'/'Fedora 8 or rawhide' My hunch is that if someone says "this is still broken in Fedora 7", a developer would naturally ask next, "how about in Fedora 8 or rawhide?" Save them a step and some frustration.

John

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux