On Dec 27, 2007 11:58 AM, Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1. provide a subpackage with the kernel module sources > > 2. let this package obsolete kmod-sysprof > > 3. provide a build procedure for the kernel module > > 4. patch the main sysprof application to help the user understanding > > what is going on > > Please don't do this. What would be an advantage of this approach > compared to shipping a binary module? The solution that seems most > logical for me is to remove the sysprof package from Fedora altogether, > and it will surely find some love in Livna and RPMFusion. > The main advantage of this approach is actually that I can avoid moving the package between repos... I hope to get some more (different?) views on the topic Thanks a lot Gianluca -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
