Antonio M wrote: > as I wrote I joined a bug....there is enough information there to > check the issue, otherwise they can ask for further info usually if I > am testing a rawhide, I think that system must be fully updated :-) > an unupdated system should be an exception, so there should be no need > to ask for package release.. You didn't include a link to the bug, so the information really isn't there. And a 'fully updated' system assumes your chosen mirror is completely in sync with whichever mirror someone else NOT seeing that issue has chosen, which is not a safe assumption. At the same time, it frequently happens that packages can be pulled OUT of rawhide due to problems, and you may have the version which has already disappeared while reporting an issue to the list... until people ask you or go do the bug search / repo listing themselves they won't know what you've got, so they can't help you fix it. Including a version of effected packages is ALWAYS helpful and very rarely not needed. I don't care to argue over how you choose to report issues to the list, but thats just not being as thorough as you could be. -- Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> <ajfarris@xxxxxxxxx> gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3 No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer ---- ---- -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
