2007/12/12, shrek-m@xxxxxx <shrek-m@xxxxxx>: > Antonio M schrieb: > > 2007/12/12, Jeff Needle <jneedle@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > >> You say "I set Selinux to enforced (immediately after updates)". What was > >> the state of SELinux prior to that? Permissive? I wonder if you have a > >> labeling issue. Looking over your messages would help you, or you can > >> just try to relabel everything by creating the file /.autorelabel and > >> rebooting. > > yes permissive.....how do I recreate the file /.autolabel??? > > > > "autorelabel" not "autolabel" :) > > as root > # touch /.autorelabel > > -- > shrek-m > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > i set selinux= 0 at boot time and the system is up and running (even if I have other problems ) For sure I will not run selinux=enforcing for a long time. Testing is testing, but I do not want to enforce my testing on unneeded issues, i.e. at the moment selinux policy and updates are causing more disadvantages and troubles than advantages. And this way of development risks that many testers may abandon selinux....so development will get slower. My two cents -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
