Whoops, mis-replied. . . > On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 11:39:31AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> I expect that we(http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/LiveUpgrade) might want to find a way to deal with this, maybe not with Obsoletes, but something inthe f-r.rpm %postinstall or something. Maybe not. > > It seems to me that if a package blocks something in updates > and is an "orphan" (both conditions tested in one time or another) then it should be marked for a removal; otherwise I would be very careful about doing anything hasty. Likely packages deleted > that way should be marked quite prominently in logs. Agreed. I wouldn't want to pull something off someone's system just because Fedora stopped carrying it, if the user finds it useful. In the case of an abi dep, like rhnlib and python, yum sees that the upgrade will break rhnlib, so won't do it with rhnlib there, which is The Right Thing To Do. Maybe we just leave all as it is, and add a list of dead packages to the release notes for each release, so you know what to pull beforehand if you want. > Michal > -- novus ordo absurdum -- novus ordo absurdum -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
