dragoran <drago01 <at> gmail.com> writes: > sure I agree with that .. but the problem is that kmail does not seem > to support it and he is asking if support for it is planned/possible > because thats the reason stopping him from using it. (although I agree > that filling a RFE or using the upstream mailinglist would be more > productive) > I seem to remember that requests to include html handling for kmail upstream resulted in a lack of willingness to work towards its inclusion in the code. However even though there may be some users who would prefer not to have kmail enabled to handle html fully, there may equally well be be others who do want this facility. Has there ever been a survey to ask? Therefore it would be nice if there was the option to select full handling of html mail within kmail even if the default was not to do so. By this I mean that if selected as "enabled" then when an html mail is received then hitting reply/forward would retain the html formatting so that the recipient of the reply/forward would not get badly formatted text that originated from kmail in the process but properly formatted htmal - and currently in this situation kmail munged the original html stuff. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
