Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 06:58:24 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 04:53:24 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Tom Brinkman wrote:
IIRC you were the one that complained when I posted that
script long ago (over a year, nearly two?). Of course you're
correct, but, again IIRC that is a script authored by SV, an
he an other devels are aware that --s-b often fails an
they're workin on it on yum-devel, the ML.
Actually. no. The script was written before the plugin
appeared.
Yes, did I say anthing different?
Your claim is that developers are already aware of the problems
which wouldn't the case where everyone workarounds the problems
without reporting them.
It's already a subj on yum-devel Read "[Yum-devel] [PATCH]
Obsoletes are similar to updates for provides changing
From: Jeremy Katz
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/yum-devel/2007-October/004458.html
This is a core yum behavior change and not a plugin patch. Besides like
I said there is more than one problem being discussed in the
skip-broken. I am pretty sure not all of them are known issues yet.
Rahul
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
