David Boles <dgboles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > on 9/20/2007 2:46 AM, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > Jim Cornette <fct-cornette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> David Boles wrote: > >>> Not sure, exactly, what you are saying here. Remove is not normally > >>> necessary. Just exclude the packages that are causing the problems with > >>> some of the packages in the update. > > > > [...] > > > >> So what would the right command to get the packages installed without > >> conflict be? Would it be something like below? Or would simply > >> determining your need for the conflicting package and removing it be a > >> better alternative? > >> > >> yum -y --skip-broken --exclude=digikam > > > > I'd vote for axing yum-skip-broken. It has *never* worked. > In a different post I noted that you have to turn on the plugin for it to > work since it defaults to off. > > yum --skip-broken update for example Or "yum update --skip-broken". Both bomb out here when there is some conflict, updating nothing whatsoever. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
