On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 12:48 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > glabels-2.0.4-6.fc8 > > ------------------- > > * Fri Aug 03 2007 Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.0.4-6 > > - Update License tagging (GPLv2+). This necessitates a split of two > > subpackages: > > (1) glabels-doc: Runtime documentation for gLabels (GFDLv1.1+) > > (2) glabels-libs: Shared libraries for gLabels (LGPLv2+) > > This is very unfortunate. Packages should be defined by logical > boundaries, not legal trivia. Well, even if this was not done for the licensing reasons, I'd probably still split it into at least a libs subpackage for better multilib handling (since it produces a devel subpackage). Blame upstream's multiple licensing though. :P It just seems a bit simpler to me to do it this way rather than going through and meticulously listing licenses per files in the spec. Apologies for any inconvenience this may cause. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
