On 31/07/07, 2004 ruffneck <ruffneck2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 31.07.07, 17:38, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > First of all, thank you for quick answer! > > > We separated the Xen kernel from the bare metal kernel because porting > > Xen from the ancient XenSource delivered kernelss to current LKML state > > of the art was taking too much time. Xen porting was delaying updates > > of bare metal kernels to an unacceptable degree. > > > Ok, I got it. > > > As for Xen being merged upstream, while we welcome it, it is of no use to > > Fedora at this time because it is far from feature complete, nor does it > > have the architecture coverage we need > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2007-July/msg00106.html > > Regards, > > Dan. > > Daniel, please, correct me if I'm wrong. In linux-2.6.23 merged only DomU part of Xen, am I right? If I am, that it is really useless at this time. Correct, only DomU was merged. It seems to be taking a while for folks to grasp this, having seen a lot of "OMG, Xen MERGED!!! Ponies!!!!" posts scattered about, although with posts like: http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/21/132251&from=rss who can blame them. Cheers Chris -- http://www.chruz.com -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
