On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:04 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 19:56 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:08:12 -0500 > > Mike Chambers <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Unless you are able to create an iso from rawhide, how can you do a > > > test install if boot.iso doesn't work with i386? Obviously besides > > > the ppc and other arches. > > > > The boot.iso problem isn't total. All of my machines and qemu boot > > just fine with boot.iso. It seems to be a small subset of machines. > > Will is working on narrowing down where it stopped working so that we > > can see what changed. A bisect of the trees if you will. > > Right - so far it only affects my Dell machines - an Intel developer > system we tested works fine. > > I've narrowed the problem down to somewhere between July 15 (which > works) and July 20 (which doesn't). Update: I've narrowed it down to the July 17th rawhide. So something in this changelog broke booting: http://redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2007-July/msg00374.html I'm guessing kernel, but binutils changes can be tricky too.. -w
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
