On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 14:52 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:15 -0500 > "Justin Conover" <justin.conover@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > [justin@echelon ~]$ uname -a > > Linux echelon.whq.sprint.com 2.6.20-2925.11.fc7xen #1 SMP Mon Jun 11 > > 16:18:59 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > Is it because I'm on a Xen kernel? > > hrm, that /shouldn't/ make much of a difference, but I've honestly > never tried running pungi like that. I didn't look at the rest, just > got concerned when I saw you say x86 on x86_64, and the traceback is > common for wrong arch composing. This thread should live on one mailing list or another. It seems the model definition might be wrong (x86_64 arch defined with i386 repos, or something). I've posted this same response to the revisor-devel list. Jonathan Steffan daMaestro -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
