On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 02:21:06 -0400, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday 26 May 2007 02:18:15 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > But I suspect that ldconfig and desktop > > update could be run once for the whole transaction rather than once > > for each package that needs it. > > It's not as simple as that though, as some packages need to run themselves > in %post and thus need to have their libraries accessable and thus really do > need ldconfig ran. Or even more difficult to discover is package B needs to > run package A in %post so Package A's libraries must be acessable. > > That said, yes, there is a lot to gain for batching these timely operations. > Doing so in an intelligent way that doesn't break things is going to be > difficult at best. Is it work entering an RFE genericly saying something like try to find a way to run common post install stuff once per transaction? Would such a bugzilla be best filed against rpm? (The process spawning these tasks appeared to be anaconda, but it feels like an rpm feature. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
