On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 12:45 -0400, Brian Pepple wrote: > Yeah, upstream barely supports x86_64, so I'm actively looking for > x86_64 maintainers that want to co-maintain this package since I don't > have a x86_64 machine. If anyone is interested please contact me. I really like Blam, but (as I discovered soon after picking up its maintainership) since it uses pre-built Atom.Net and RSS.Net libraries (whose upstreams are themselves quite inactive, it seems) and doesn't play well with multilib (as well as being a generally misbehaving application), I've recently been giving up on it a lot and using Liferea instead (Rawhide/x86_64 on an Intel Core2 Duo). If you need some testing/debugging help, just tell me what to do :) - though I won't be able to do anything *too* invasive or time-consuming until this semester of class lets out at the end of the month due to procrastination of projects and whatnot. T_T [As an aside - though I'm happy to continuing maintaining it, does anyone actively use/test Blam stuff that would like to comaintain it with me or take it over fully? Alas, version 1.8.4 has a nasty crasher bug that neither myself or upstream has been able to track down and appropriately squish, so that's why the Fedora package is still at 1.8.3 (plus some backported fixes from 1.8.4).] Thanks. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) / FSF & EFF Member GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ About: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PeterGordon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
