Re: fc7t4: still eating babies?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: fc7t4: still eating babies?
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:24:38 +0200
In-reply-to: <5256d0b0704290539n3c898d67rc9f585bbca576f4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat / Paris
References: <9f71cef00704290422t2cd06619j7c2e192415ae17fb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5256d0b0704290539n3c898d67rc9f585bbca576f4a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)

At a guess the cause of the confusion between the 2 installs is a
duplication of disk labels between the 2 installs on the 2 disks.


Disk labels were distinct.

-benjamin

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe:https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

References:
- fc7t4: still eating babies?
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: fc7t4: still eating babies?
  - From: Peter Robinson

Prev by Date: Selinux chokes httpd
Next by Date: Re: fc7t4: still eating babies?
Previous by thread: Re: fc7t4: still eating babies?
Next by thread: F7 - installation hangs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]