On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:36:26 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michael Schwendt said: > > > Essentially, you're saying that any package which requires a versioned > > > API should, rather than having a build requirement on the package, > > > should have a build *file* requirement on either one of the include > > > files, or the pkg-config file. Because, well, the package that provides > > > it might have a name change. > > > > > > Is that *seriously* what you're suggesting? > > > > Where do you see such a suggestion? > > It's the logical conclusion. And the conclusion is false, because I've not suggested anything as a replacement for the Provides or BuildRequires. I've told you what doesn't work anymore nowadays. We've had gpgme03 "Provides: gpgme = 0.3.something", too, and a similar thing in other packages in the past, until rpm broke it. Btw, from your gnucash spec: # for gtkhtml3-devel BuildRequires: /usr/include/libgtkhtml-3.8/gtkhtml/gtkhtml.h A change on "Tue Mar 13 2007". > But, eh. rpm broken, film at 11. > > Bill Right. I'm innocent. ;) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list