Re: kernel.3045 and MSI/e1000?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom London wrote:
>>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'm presuming e1000 doesn't really 'need'
> MSI then...
> 
> Any chance this is related to e1000 stability issues?

It could be. Some testing should help show if it is.


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]