On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:58:35 +0100
mschwendt.tmp0701.nospam@xxxxxxxx (Michael Schwendt) wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 08:36:51 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:35:08 -0500, Doctor Who wrote:
> >
> > >> Ok....good to know. And k3b-extras?
> > >
> > > k3b 1.0* is ABI-incompatible with k3b 0.12.*
> > >
> > > After several weeks of sitting in CVS in form of 1.0rc6 it was
> > > built and released into Rawhide without a warning. So, k3b-extras
> > > needs an update, too.
> >
> > I had suggested in the merge review for k3b that it (basically)
> > Obsoletes: k3b-extras < %{version}
> >
> > If that doesn't happen in a timely manner, perhaps we could simply
> > remove k3b-extras from devel/rawhide.
>
> And break upgrades from FC <= 6? Not an option, IMO.
>
> Obsoleting k3b-extras OR upgrading it is a MUSTFIX issue.
+1.
FWIW, a rebuild of k3b-extras here in mock works fine.
Why not bump the release and rebuild for now?
Once the main k3b can obsolete this there will be no reason to rebuild,
but until then, you should keep current to avoid broken dependencies.
kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list