On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:39:51AM +0100, dragoran wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 03:08:04PM -0600, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > > > It gets better... > > > > http://www.devxnews.com/article.php/3658001 > > > > > > > > "Pratt also explained that Xen is no longer actively seeking inclusion in the mainline Linux kernel either." > > > Oh, swell. So a 2.6.20 kernel for FC5 is DOA. :-( > > > > Not really. The rebases over the last year or two have been done by > > Red Hat, not Xensource. By the time the 'official' Xen tree is > > updated, it's based on some six month old kernel which is uninteresting. > > So sit tight and wait for the Xen team to do their magic. > > (Largely the work of Juan Quintela, who succeeds in doing in a month > > what takes Xensource half a year to do) > > > > > I don't know how Juan handles this but wouldn't it be easier to port xen > during a kernel development cycle and not after the kernel is released? > If there are some last minute changes they wont be that big. I assume > that this will save a lot of time (if not already done). Tracking a moving target is hard work. Bear in mind that the xen patch is _enormous_ Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list