Re: What is the fascination with 'spins'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/6/07, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 17:53, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> Is there some mechanism in all this to pull packages into a spin but
> not set them to install by default? Or is the current group selection
> / package selection going away in favour of a system where you make
> your package selections at ISO build time and then install additional
> packages later via network?

A package manifest is just a flat file of packages to put on the media.

A comps file is what defines the groupings of these packages and what is
default/manditory/optional.

As pungi seems to digest comps.xml files for its package input, I am
not sure what the problem would be to make a big DVD spin with all the
groupings that an admin would need to install. I would assume that you
just feed pungi a bunch of comps.xml files or yumgroups.xml files and
you will have all your different sub-spins in one big DVD spin. Isn't
this how things will work or am I way off?

/Mike

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]