On 2/5/07, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 20:19:45 +0000,
"monty19@ hotmail.com" <monty19@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Personally, I think having separate ISO images for Desktop, Developer,
> Server, KDE, and whatever else is a pretty silly idea. It's one of the
> main reasons I don't like Ubuntu. I run Fedora on a system I would
I think it is a bit early to declare custom spins a silly idea. Even if it
doesn't turn out to be that useful for Fedora directly, there is a potential
for it to be useful for third parties. I think making it easy to define
custom spins is an interesting experiment and that we will need to wait a
bit before we find out whether or not it is a really useful feature or not.
Indeed, they're not silly. One of the projects that I have worked on
, we created custom FC5 installation DVDs for a lab environment that
had all of the software that we needed including updated packages.
It's very useful ability.
However, as I stated in another thread. It needs to be obvious what
CD/DVD has the developer tools. There are many people that cannot
access yum repos because they're in a location that cannot access the
Internet. Having someone create a custom spin is not always possible
when the one receiving it is many miles away. (There's always snail
mail.)
Don't get me wrong. I think that it's a good idea to have these
user/task specific spins. I do think that you should have one that
has "everything".
--
James Hubbard
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list