On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:26:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wednesday 24 January 2007 07:12, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > So lets see some sustainable examples. > > > > OpenIPMI (this one has packaging bugs, like .pc file(s) in -libs), > > audit, bind, file and so on. Curiously enough, all of these have > > static libs packaged in -devel, which - according to current packaging > > guidelines - is a review blocker. > > I just don't think creating 2K -libs packages or -docs packages is the more > sustainable solution. Yes it doesn't seem viable to do it for all of them. Still, it's necessary to do it for some. > Fixing the rpm bug seems more appropriate. It's not really a bug. It's a side effect of multilib that requires special treatment. The trick is to implement this in rpm effectively. Regards, -- Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann*at*icm.edu.pl> Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling Warsaw University | http://www.icm.edu.pl | tel. +48 (22) 5540810 -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list