On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:41:52 -0500, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Respin attempts can happen, but when the new package set + anaconda fails, > who's going to do the work to fix things? Well it looks like it is going to be the people doing the respins. I have tried some of this and even reported some bugs I found while testing things. I have also learned that if you use the versions of anaconda and its dependencies that were originally delivered for FC6, respinning DVDs seems to work. I didn't get CD version to work quite right, but I did get it working well enough, that I could use the first CD to do an http install on a machine that couldn't read DVD+RWs. Considering that I only run Fedora on 3 machines, I spent a lot more time doing respin attempts for FC6 than was worth it from a testing perspective. But I did it primarily as a learning experience. However, if I end up with time to do some FC7 testing when it gets close to release, this will still be useful, as I can test installing with the updated packages after say, FC7test3 has been built. On sort of a related note, is the Pungi project going to just support doing respins on the original package set, rather than being able to support respins using updated packages? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list