On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 12:05:37AM +1030, n0dalus wrote: > On 11/28/06, Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> echo $(fgconsole) > $VT_NR # remember the current vt > > > >Really weird. Why not simply 'fgconsole >$VT_NR' ? > > echo $(fgconsole) > ... will put all the output on a single line, > which might be important. Are there really any circumstances when 'fgconsole' outputs more than a single number? 'man fgconsole' seems to suggest otherwise. What is more, you are using that later as $(<$VT_NR) which will be a single line no matter what (unless you quote). Even when this would be not the case then how do you propose to employ later a content of "other lines"? Whatever. A detail straight from Rube Goldberg but still a detail. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list