On 11/19/06, Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 20:07 -0800, Miles Lane wrote:
> When I install beryl and emerald from development-extras, it pulls in
> the following packages from :
> heliodor
> bdock
> beryl-dbus
> aquamarine
>
> I am curious why these packages aren't provided on the
> development-extras repository.
These dependencies are under review and will get imported once APPROVED
and CVS gets fixed up. The idea was to create a meta-package to pull in
all of the Beryl stuff but that did not quite as planned unfortunately.
See the thread on the Extras list for more info:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00321.html
> When I updated control-center, I got the following:
> control-center-2.17.1-6.fc7:
> Updating : control-center ######################### [1/6]
> /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libseom.so.0 is not a symbolic link
>
> This library file is provided by one of the packages on wilsonnet.com:
> # rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libseom.so.0
> [...]
Installed material from third-party repositories is completely the
responsibility of the user. If it breaks, you keep the pieces. :|
Of course, I understand this. I have no problem with picking up
pieces. I just try to pass on awareness of issues, in case it will
help promote solutions for everyone.
Thanks a lot for your info regarding the repository plans!
Miles
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list