On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 01:56:28PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > I meant unknown if we'd use kadischi or some other tool. There are some > concerns with the kadischi code base and how it works, which is why it isn't > the 'official' Fedora live CD yet. OK, I subscribed myself to the live CD mailing list and I checked out Kadischi. I have to see how good it works, but I already saw way too much hardcoded lists in the code, that should be in a configuration file (that such a config file is just Python code is fine, but it should be separated from the code). Furthermore, I don't immediately see why a live CD generator should (also) get a graphical user interface, but as I have the same opinion about a word processor :-), I won't further discuss this. Anyway, I'll give it a try and start further discussions on the live CD list. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list