Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 10:27:41PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Based on the reviews and user feedback this is our best our release
of Fedora Core 6 yet.
I am not so sure if you should be in so self-congratulory mode. The
release by itself is fine but anaconda, or something below it, looks
mighty sick. So far I had that experience on three different
machines - one i386, two x86_64 but different mobos/chipsets and two
updates (i386 and x86_64) and one a fresh install on a "virgin"
hardware.
I need specific bug reports that can be reported as common to say
otherwise.
Rahul
I installed FC6 on a computer with a SIS integrated video. Anaconda was
not able to recognize the proper video card.
Fortunately, the mention of the new option to pick whatever video driver
you wish with xdriver= allowed me to continue the successful
installation by specifying the sis video driver.
Having flexible options which can be customized to meet the needs of the
customer/ experimenter makes overcoming problems a lot easier than with
earlier installers.
I'm sure that there will still be tough installation problems in the
future with installers. Anyway, I like the feature that is simplistic
ab=nd still flexible. Overall, I think this concept will make
installation on hardware which is questionably detectable a bit more
manageable by the customer.
For business, where the ultimate survival of an enterprise lies, there
are administrators (you would think so anyway) which will buy bulk
quantities of equipment, realize the specs and would prefer specifying
their system parameters in an easy and flexible manor.
This is a great release as far as I can tell and not too many obstacles
were encountered on my end with this release.
Great job, but it will be better on the next cycle.
Jim
--
The lines are all busy (busied out, that is -- why let them in to begin
with?).
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list