Re: Uh oh...more packages in updates-testing shouldn't be there...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 22 October 2006 00:28, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> I disagree.  ;o)  You shouldn't have to even think about it for a
> millisecond.  With the amount of computing hardware at RHAT's
> disposal, there should be computer software in complete and total
> control of preventing issues of this nature from occurring or
> recurring.  ;o)

Heh yeah.  The tool was originally written for beehive and brew is different 
enough that the old stopgaps are not applicable anymore.  We should be able 
to fix this, but with all the computing hardware and software we have, the 
one thing we're constantly out of is human hardware and human time (:

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp9qG5zCf61i.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]