On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 09:17 +0100, Caolan McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 22:36 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote: > > Steven Haigh schrieb: > > > Quoting James <jdickson@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > >> Thanks.. I would love to use the bcm43xx module but it is flaky at best > > >> on my Dell Latitude D800.. ndiswrapper works really well. > > > > > > I have the same on my Inspiron 8600. The rest of the machine works > > I'll probably find some time at the weekend to finally file bug-reports > > related to bcm43xx. > > > > Strangely engough the only three people reporting problems related to > > bcm43xx are all running Dell-laptops, so I wonder whether that might be > > related. > > Well, I have a dell latitude with a bcm43xx pccard shoved into it and > was a fairly happy bunny except that while on the road recently I > finally noticed that stuff works well only when the power cable is > plugged in during network address acquisition. i.e. NetworkManager works > perfectly well with the bcm34xx (for WEP at least) when plugged into the > wall. can you look in /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/power and see if the content of that changes between AC and battery operation? (can take a few seconds to update) if it does, can you mail (me) both? (if so I think I may have an idea on how to fix things ;) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list