On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 08:21:16PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Dave Jones wrote: > > > I'm hoping to get a 2.6.18rc6 based kernel into updates-testing soon > > (and then rebase to .18 for updates-final when that gets released), but > > as usual, xen is throwing a spanner in the works. > > Thank you, sir! BTW, remind me: when you show things you change in the > changelog for the emails on the updates-tesing and updates list, > do those changes mean those are the only ones you did, or that they differ > from the published kernel.org kernels? Just the most critical change(s)? > Or is it something else? Every change should have an entry in the changelog. The only exception being the "abbreviated" changelogs for the upstream rebases. For eg.. * Sat Sep 9 2006 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2.6.17.13 This means that every patch that is listed at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.17.13 is included in this build, and for more info check there. every other change, even if its just changing a CONFIG_ option, should get a changelog entry. Occasionally I'll slip up and forget to changelog something, but that's usually a rare case. Dave -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list