Re: Execute permission on /etc/profile (what is wrong with pup?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:27:25AM +0100, William John Murray wrote:
I have had problems setting up proxies for system tasks, and just realized that /etc/profile did not have x permission on
my new FC6T2 system.

This is not needed (and the same applies to various pieces
in /etc/profile.d) and may not even be desirable.  /etc/profile
is not a shell script to be executed, as then various environment
changes would apply to an execution subshell and would be reverted
on its termination, but something to be sourced.  Different
operations and not the same effects.

When I added that pup started to work behind a proxy server, good.

No idea "in blind" what kind of "magic" may be involved here but if
something really checks x permissions on /etc/profile then it is in
error.  Are you sure that this "started to work" was not just
coincidental?

Is there a general problem here?

I really do not know what is the problem but sounds like pretty
particular.

  Michal

 yes Michal,
            You were right. Somehow yesterday pup got through my firewall.
But it does not today, whatever I do with write permission on /etc/profile/
Maybe something happened to the firewall machine.
 I finally see that I have to set the proxy settings directly in /etc/yum.conf.
Wow, thats really is desktop integration!
              Bill

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]