On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:55, Mary Ellen Foster wrote: > Actually, in this particular case (evolution etc.), I think it was > actually updates-testing ... and this is the second time fairly > recently that broken dependencies have made it in there. Better > updates-testing than updates-released, though, I guess? Yes. This was a failure both on my part and the developer. I was too lazy to click the 'check broken deps' button like I did earlier in the day. The same problem hit rawhide which is why I made the comments I did. The developer is working very hard to get the rest of the updates in place for -testing to solve the broken deps. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpEJdC9exVhF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list