On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:24:59AM -0700, alan wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >usually ATrpms jumps into testing at test2 or test3. This time we'll > >try supporting FC6 from test1 onwards. > > > >A couple of notes: > > > >o ATrpms uses disttags of 5.90 matching the internal verisoning of > > test1. When test2 hits the road packages will all be rebuilt with > > 5.91 as a disttag and so on. That way upgrade paths are retained > > (but these are not guaranteed within test releases/rawhide anyway, > > so don't feel on the safe side) and rebuilds don't have to bump the > > buildtag in front of the disttag, so when your FC5 box has > > foo-1.2.3-4.* and test/rawhide bits also start with foo-1.2.3-4.* it > > means that the same sources/specfiles are still used. > > > >o kernel support (kmdls) is there, both for the test release kernel, > > 2.6.16-1.2289_FC6, as well as hopefully the latest rawhide kernel, > > 2.6.17-1.2318_FC6. Oops, the latest is already 2.6.17-1.2328.fc6, > > and by the time you're reading this probably even further. The point > > is that ATrpms will try to support the latest rawhide kernel, but it > > certainly can't keep up to the pace of rawhide. :) > > > >o Please report bugs, especially regression wrt FC5 on > > bugzilla.atrpms.net under fc6. > > Cool. The only problem I see is that the nVIDIA kernel driver is bjorken > with xorg 7.1. (And will be until they create a Linux driver for the 9xxx > series of drivers.) > > Are there x86_64 builds? Yes, but only for the FC6t1 kernel (2.6.16-1.2289_FC6). I saw that the build breaks for rawhide kernels, so I didn't make the nvidia builds public, yet. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgprLvshAu3Gj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list