On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:47 +0100, Paul wrote: > > Given the disparity between the actual kernel released and the > GFS/cman/dlm/gnbd-kernel reqs, two questions need to be asked. The first > is does anyone using rawhide still use GFS/cman/dlm/gnbd-kernel and why > is it so far behind? (could it not be better served being orphaned from > core and added to extras?) Why move the problem to Extras? Extras is not a dumping ground. The real problem here is that these are patches to the kernel that are not upstream and that requires lots of effort to maintain. There is a push to get these GFS modules accepted upstream and remove the need for these packages, and thus solve the problem of the drift. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list